Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 224 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Input text and font-family
    #37488

    Unfortunately the task still has “In progress” status. Till end of the week we’ll make a decision regarding new maintenance build release and features/bugfixes it includes. Hopefully this issue will be in the list. We’ll let you know

    in reply to: PD4ML redirects System.err
    #37431

    Hi! Right, PD4ML redirects System.err, but only during particular single actions: by an internal AWT image creation and by parsing SVG and mathML – to suppress non-switchable warnings to avoid log file flooding.

    A redirecting of System.err is not a perfect idea as it impacts the entire JVM for very short time, but since we added the redirect long time ago there we no problem reports from our customers.

    It can be disabled by -Dpd4ml.enable.stderr.redirects=false command line parameter, passed to JVM

    in reply to: Tomcat 10 Jakarta Multithread problem
    #37330

    > Please, what should we do to get support? We purchased support to solve this problem, and we are almost reaching the end of the 3 months with no answer.

    No worries .We will provide you with a working solution even if the maintenance period has expired. Sorry it takes some time.

    Did you have a chance to test pd4ml-bin-4.0.17-jakarta-SNAPSHOT.zip from https://pd4ml.com/v4 ?

    in reply to: Trial License page broken
    #37325

    It should work now

    in reply to: Trial License page broken
    #37324

    Thanks for pointing this out. We will fix this as soon as possible

    in reply to: Input text and font-family
    #37320

    We need time to take a closer look at this issue. I was able to reproduce something similar: internally the PDF looks correct and has the correct font links, but Acrobat falls back to Arial/Helvetics. We’ll let you know asap.

    in reply to: Input text and font-family
    #37316

    Historically, PD4ML only allows you to define the form font for an entire document through API call parameters:

    public void generateForms(boolean enable, String useTtfFont);
    public void generateForms(boolean enable, String useTtfFont, String formFontCharRange)

    However, there are no longer technical reasons to maintain the restriction. We’ll look into adding the ability to override the font via CSS

    in reply to: Jakarta Version of PD4ML v4.0.17
    #37287

    Hi! We’ve just published v4.0.17 snapshot for Jakarta: https://pd4ml.com/v4/
    Please give it a try

    in reply to: Tomcat 10 Jakarta Multithread problem
    #37270

    Ah.. sorry! We did not forget, but we still have problem with our CI/CD environment after system upgrade: it still cannot build specific versions (like the one for Jakarta Tomcat) from the most recent codebase state. I expected it to be resolved over the weekend, but obviously I underestimated the complexity. We’ll let you know you as soon as there is news.
    Sorry again it takes that long!

    in reply to: Jakarta Version of PD4ML v4.0.17
    #37256

    We are preparing a new build of Jakarta, but due to unexpected technical problems with our CI/CD environment, it has been delayed.

    BTW: Have you had the opportunity to test the older adapted version in Tomcat 10?
    https://pd4ml.com/v4/older/pd4ml-bin-4.0.15fx1-jakarta.zip

    #37255

    Hi! Before we analyzed and fixed the issue you could try to use a hybrid solution: pd4ml_tl.jar from v3 + pd4ml.jar from v4
    This combination is used by a number of our clients because porting of JSPs utilize PD4ML v3 taglib is not always possible.

    in reply to: Tomcat 10 Jakarta Multithread problem
    #37203

    Sorry for the silence! We’ll provide you with an update at latest on Monday

    in reply to: UTF-8 support missing in PD4ML v4.0.17
    #37110

    The attached PDF is a typical result of PDF conversion, when no TTF embedding feature configured.

    Did you have a chance to take a look at

    How to configure PDF fonts

    PD4ML Fonts Tool


    ?

    in reply to: Attachments in Evaluation Mode
    #37103

    We need time to investigate. A few years ago, built-in PDF viewers in web browsers did not support PDF annotations at all (technically, a PDF attachment is a type of PDF annotation). There is partial support now, but it appears that Acroread is still the only reliable way to work with PDF attachments.

    in reply to: Attachments in Evaluation Mode
    #37086

    Hi! Is it reproducible only in a particular Web browser or it appears like that also in Acrobat Reader?
    Could you please share with us a minimalistic PDF sample to illustrate the issue?

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 224 total)